Turgenev "Mumu." Presentation on the topic "Lesson on the story of I.S.

Slide 1

Slide 2

A man 12 inches tall, built like a hero and deaf and dumb from birth. Gifted with extraordinary strength, he worked for four - the matter was in his hands.
In the courtyard of the Moscow estate, Gerasim looks like Gulliver among the Lilliputians. An epithet is a word that defines an object or phenomenon and emphasizes its properties, qualities and characteristics. Describing Gerasim, the author uses such epithets as mighty hands, heroic strength.

Slide 3

In general, Gerasim was of a strict and serious disposition, he loved order in everything, even the roosters did not dare to fight in his presence - otherwise there would be trouble!
The world of silence in which the hero is immersed is simple and harsh, excessively full of work, obedience and strict order. The world of words in which all the inhabitants of the estate live, including the old lady, is deceitful, cunning, cruel and vicious.

Slide 4

With all his servants, Gerasim had a relationship that was not exactly friendly - they were afraid of him - but short: he accepted them as his own.

Slide 5

Slide 6

V. M. Maksimov. All in the past.

Slide 7

The story of Gerasim and Mumu is a love story of two lonely hearts in a hostile world.

Slide 8

Nobody sympathizes with Gerasim. If he is deaf and dumb, that means he is a second-class citizen.

Slide 9

The whims of the lady are the law for everyone.

Slide 10

The decisive duel between Gerasim and the cowardly servants is like a fairy-tale action, a heroic victory over the wicked, a triumph of the Russian spirit.
Gerasim's closet is a small fortress. Relations between Gerasim and the population of the “yard” become hostile and take on the character of military operations.

Slide 11

The highest mystical manifestation of Gerasim's love for Mumu lies in his readiness to kill the most dear creature in the world.

Slide 12

Comparison is the artistic definition of one object or phenomenon by comparison with another. Comparisons help us understand Gerasim’s condition at different periods of his life. When he was brought from the village to the city, he looked like a hunted animal, a young bull that had fallen from a fertile field into a railroad car. At the end of the story, the hero looks like a lion, the king of beasts, free and liberated.
Gerasim always unquestioningly obeyed the master's will, but when Mumu died, a feeling of protest arose in him against the indifference and hypocrisy that reigned in the master's house, against the whims of the bored old woman. Awakened human dignity, a craving for the earth became stronger than the usual slavish obedience, and the hero realized that he would not be able to live as before.

Slide 13

The hero differs from others in that, under the conditions of serfdom, which disfigures the human soul, he alone retained kindness, honesty, decency, self-esteem, pride and independence. Landscape is an artistic description of nature. Gerasim deeply feels nature and its beauty. At the end of the story, the description of a beautiful summer night and the coming morning helps to understand the hero’s new state of mind, the feeling of freedom, the beauty of life.
Why is Gerasim called “the most remarkable person” in the story?

Slide 14

This is a story about the inevitable death of serfdom, about the fact that new times are coming.
The main idea of ​​the story "Mumu".
Gerasim’s “rebellion” is embodied not only in leaving the Moscow estate, but also in his final alienation from people.
Zavyalov. Samson's Revenge. 1836

Slide 15

Test work on the work
In his village, Gerasim: A) plowed B) carpentered C) was a blacksmith 2. In the city he became: A) a shoemaker B) a janitor C) a tailor Gerasim lived with a lady: A) together with others B) separately from everyone C) he did not have his own corner The servants treated him with: A) love B) respect C) hatred What kind of sedate bird did Gerasim resemble?
The appearance of Mumu in Gerasim’s life: A) alienated him from people B) did not change his life C) allowed him to give away all his unclaimed love In the sentence: “He walked with some kind of indestructible courage, with desperate and at the same time joyful determination,” the highlighted words are : A) epithets B) allegory C) comparison The words “determination” and “courage” are: A) synonyms B) homonyms C) antonyms Describing Gerasim: “grew up dumb and powerful, like a tree grows on fertile land,” the author used: A) comparison B) epithet C) personification Gerasim left Moscow because: A) missed home B) tired of city life C) this life became unbearable for him The work is based on: A) artistic fiction B) historical reality C) fantastic event

The presentation is prepared for the excellent development of a lesson-conversation “Heights of Epiphany” (L. Roslyakova. I’m going to a literature lesson: 5th grade: Book for the teacher - M.: “First of September”, 2001, pp. 160-169). Although this work is considered in the 5th grade, I agree with the author of the development that it is possible to work with it in high school. For example, in comparison with “One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich” by A. Solzhenitsyn. After all, the theme of freedom, the theme of human dignity, the theme of freedom of choice - these themes unite both works.

L. Roslyakova. Lesson-conversation “Heights of insight”

(About the story “Mumu” ​​by I. S. Turgenev).

I. The teacher's word

How often does Turgenev’s story “Mumu” ​​remain in the memory of readers as an eerie story about a senselessly ruined dog, causing the puzzling question “Why didn’t Gerasim go to the village with her? »
At the same time, this story, which requires concentration on the feelings of the deaf-mute hero, is not so simple for an adult reader. Understanding the changes that happened to Gerasim is impossible without slow, thoughtful reading, for which an appropriate attitude is necessary. Creating it is the main goal of our lesson.
To do this, let’s try to deviate from the linear-sequential principle of study and focus our efforts on the beginning and end of the story, focusing on the unusual character of the hero, noted by the writer: “Of... all... the servants, the most remarkable person was the janitor Gerasim...” “He was a nice man...” These phrases will be the starting point of the conversation

II. Conversation:
Since Gerasim cannot tell anything about himself, the idea of ​​him will consist of comparing him with those around him. How does he stand out among them?
(We analyze the beginning of the story up to the words “So a year passed...”)
This is a real hero, he works for four people, plows, mows, threshes.
The author calls his work “tireless.” What meaning does he put into this concept?
Gerasim does not know fatigue, although he works from morning to evening. Peasant work is to his heart, it takes up all his free time and does not let him get bored.
But the usual course of his life is disrupted. How does the text say this?
“The lady took him from the village...”
What strength must a lonely old woman have to treat a hero like this!
It’s not a matter of fabulous power, it’s just that she is a landowner, and Gerasim is a serf who is completely in her power.
What was the move to Moscow like for Gerasim from the lady’s point of view?
Promotion: after all, janitor's work is easier than peasant work.
It is difficult for the reader to judge what Gerasim himself thought about this, which is probably why the author introduces into the subsequent narrative a whole cascade of comparisons that make it possible to feel the state of the deaf-mute.
- What secret do comparisons carry? Let's turn to them.
“Alienated by his misfortune from the community of people, he grew up dumb and powerful, like a tree growing on fertile ground...”
But here the price of loss is indicated. Gerasim was deprived of the soil that had nourished him all his life - rural life, tireless peasant work, which captivated him completely and did not leave him with thoughts of loneliness. But doesn't he have enough strength to adapt to changes and take root in new soil? Of course, that's enough, but why? The unspoken nature of this question will be emphasized by comparing Gerasim to a young healthy bull being transported by rail: “...they rush with a knock and squeal, and God knows where they rush!”

Gerasim carried this painful bewilderment in his soul, exhausted under its weight, but no one was interested in why the new janitor “suddenly went somewhere into a corner and, throwing his broom and shovel far, threw himself on the ground with his face and lay for whole hours, motionless, as if caught beast".
How should a caught animal feel?
Fear, horror of the unknown, near death.
And no one cares about such suffering...
And now let’s briefly write down in our notebooks what we learned about the hero: “Gerasim is a deaf-mute hero, lonely, suffering, perplexed.”
(As we work on the text of the story, we will add to this chain, which will help summarize the search results, but for now we will continue the conversation.)
What is the source of his suffering?
The fact that he is a serf, the fact that others control his fate.
But there is one more comparison that shifts the reader’s attention, temporarily taking him away from thinking about the hard lot of the serf.
Why does the author compare his hero to a gander? Is there an explanation in the text?
“... the goose, as you know, is an important and sensible bird: Gerasim felt respect for them, followed them and fed them; he himself looked like a sedate gander.”

This comparison completes the cascade, summing up the first impression of Gerasim. But is everything clear to us about it? Let's take a closer look at the word “sedate”, clarifying its meaning in the dictionary. (Working with a dictionary in literature lessons is very important; it helps to enrich the vocabulary, giving an idea not only of new concepts, but also revealing the semantic nuances of familiar and familiar words.)
“Stageful” - judicious, serious, important.
It seems that the meaning of the word “important” is beyond doubt, and yet let’s check our definition with the dictionary, choosing the meaning related to appearance.
Important - proudly majestic, arrogant.
And arrogant - arrogant, arrogant.
And arrogant - expressing conceit, arrogant.
Is Gerasim really like that? However, one thing is clear: the importance, arrogance, and arrogance that appear in his sedateness are associated with a feeling of superiority over others.

Where are its origins?
Let's re-read the beginning of the second paragraph: Gerasim in his village “was considered perhaps the most serviceable draft man.”
Serf duty is a kind of debt that Gerasim honestly paid to his mistress, conscientiously cultivating the land. Turgenev further notes that his hero “was of a strict and serious disposition, loved order in everything; even the roosters did not dare to fight in front of him.” And a person who loves order is the embodiment of reliability, you can rely on him in everything, he will not do anything haphazardly. Let us remember how Gerasim furnished his closet.
But what does arrogance have to do with it? Or maybe it shades the self-esteem of a person who has something to respect himself for, because he is hardworking, honest, and reliable? Let's add these definitions to our chain and return to the text again.
Submitting to the established order, Gerasim “...followed all orders exactly, but he also knew his rights, and no one could sit in his place at the capital.” Yes, our hero is one of those who knew his place well, the place of a serf, ready to “exactly” carry out the orders of his owner. But the time will come when the exemplary servant, showing unheard-of insolence, will voluntarily leave the young lady. The reasons for leaving will remain a mystery to others.

Let us take a closer look at Gerasim returning to the village “... with some kind of indestructible courage, with desperate and at the same time joyful determination.” (We read this passage to the words “... he saw countless stars in the sky that illuminated his path, and, like a lion, he stood strong and cheerfully...”)
What does the final comparison add to our idea of ​​the hero?
Something changed in him, he became different, not like a captured animal
Comparison with a lion makes us look at Gerasim differently, whose expanding field of vision includes both the road and the stars above his head, which cannot but be reflected in his posture: we see a man with his head held high, powerful, proud, free.

What explains this change?
We pay attention to the verbs “saw” and “felt” twice repeated by the writer at the end of the passage. Are they the key to the solution? What if the ability to see and feel, heightened by the lack of hearing, reveals to the deaf-mute something that radically changes his life? Only then should the story be called not “Mumu”, but “Gerasim”.

But he left the lady because of Mumu.
This means that the events associated with it will help to understand what happened.

Gerasim does not yet know that remaining in the power of his experiences is an unaffordable luxury for a serf, who must always balance his actions with the possible reaction of his master. He is accustomed to living differently, listening to the voice of his own heart, invariably sensitive and open, so the pain of saying goodbye to Tatyana will not be able to obscure from him the suffering of a doomed creature, and Gerasim, obeying an emotional impulse, will save an abandoned puppy, not knowing that this act is incompatible with the position of a serf. This is how Mumu came into his life.
New joyful worries dispersed the gloomy thoughts, and Gerasim “was very pleased with his fate.” Then he did not yet know that the joys of a forced person are in one way or another connected with the ability to pretend, which also requires a certain insight: after all, you need to catch the fluctuations of the owner’s feelings in order to demonstrate your devotion to him at the right moment in time using available means. (Let us confirm this idea with an expressive reading of the dialogue between the hanger-on and the lady who wanted to see Mumu)

Will a deaf-mute janitor be able to achieve such virtuoso resourcefulness? Alas, he has neither experience nor skill in this matter, and an attempt to disguise the joy of Mumu’s return with external despondency will not deceive anyone. The writer called this attempt an innocent trick, thus separating him from those for whom pretense has become an indispensable condition of life.

Gerasim is destined to comprehend the logic of the relationship between the lady and the courtyard servants with his heart. The lady is convinced that any discomfort in her life is due to the actions of a specific culprit who should be found and punished. Mumu, who violated the ritual of veneration, is doomed, because, according to the lady, all the disorder is caused by the dog. And none of the courtyard servants, who had previously treated Mumu with sympathy, dared to oppose this opinion.

The circumstances surrounding her disappearance will lead Gerasim to an unexpected guess: “... the dog did not disappear by itself, it must have been brought in on the orders of the lady...”. It is not easy for a serf peasant to count among the possible culprits of his misfortune the landowner whom he was always afraid of and whose orders he followed exactly. But if the lady is at one with the despicable lackeys, then how to save Mumu?

In Gerasim’s life, a period of incredible tension of mental strength begins, making him think about the magnitude of the feelings of those around him.
The lady talks a lot about her worries and anxieties, why do those present feel awkward from these conversations?
Everyone understands that she is pretending to be sick and unhappy.” Her whole life is a complete pretense, which is why Turgenev called her a quaint old woman.

Did the servants also pretend to love Mumu?
No, they are just used to obeying the lady.
This means that the habit of submitting to other people’s feelings forces you to constantly drown out your own, and therefore the ability to compassion fades, turning into disgusting bewilderment: “Is it possible to screw up like that because of a dog!.. Really!”
The fading of feelings weakens the ability to guess, think, and understand, increasing the melancholy helplessness before life.

Against this background, Gerasim is the only one who retained his sincerity. This is a strange quality for others; it causes hidden irritation in them, leading to confrontation. The Mumu story will speed up this process.
How will our hero prove himself in the coming confrontation?
Let us remember that night when pale Gerasim squeezed Mumu’s mouth in his closet, trying against all odds to hide her presence. What does the word “pale” indicate here? Is it about terrible guesses prompted by the heart?
The forces are unequal, everyone is against him, he will not be able to protect Mumu from the villains who surround him on all sides. No exit. The only thing he can do is save the dog from the cruelty of insensitive lackeys.

The author will force his reader to witness what is forever etched in Gerasim’s memory: how calmly, with her usual politeness, Mumu ate, how trustingly she looked at her savior in the very last seconds; we will see the painful anger on his face at the moment when he subordinates himself to this promise with superhuman effort, and we will feel his fear of opening his eyes after what he has done. And during these painfully long seconds of complete immersion in himself, Gerasim is destined to rise to heights of insight inaccessible to those who have lost the sincerity of feelings and clarity of thought, dissolving them in other people's desires and mercilessly robbing themselves.
This moment will reflect the final link of our chain: Gerasim is a deaf-mute hero, lonely, suffering, perplexed, hardworking, honest, reliable, sincere, quick-witted - able to understand what the reader has to think about

III. Final words from the teacher.
So what did Gerasim understand? Let's try to imagine the course of his reasoning.
1 ...Was he, so big and strong, able to kill a defenseless creature? Did it really all begin in the silent “I listen”, which took root in his consciousness and became the embodiment of the order to which he was accustomed to obey? But he is a kind person, he was never a villain and did not want to be one, which means he needs to free himself from the hated order, breaking all previous ties...

Or maybe the immensity of pain reveals to him the immensity of the world, which previously only contained for him the lady and the servants? The most terrible moments of his life merged inextricably with pictures that could not help but ache in his heart: “Moscow has already been left behind. Meadows, vegetable gardens, fields, groves have already stretched along the banks; huts have appeared. It smelled like a village." Perhaps, having lost Mumu, in his desperate grief he felt not only the acute point of loneliness and loss, but also the saving proximity of the world cruelly taken from him, always ready to warm him with the rays of the sun, bestow him with the caress of the summer breeze and the smell of ripening rye... Is it really a man, being part of this world, maybe someone’s property, a blind instrument of evil in the wrong hands?

And the answer to this question will become so obvious to Gerasim that the recent conviction of the hopelessness of his situation will seem empty and far-fetched to him, and he will not have even a shadow of doubt about the illegality of his departure from the city.

The reader witnesses how Gerasim’s powerful nature, personifying physical and moral health, with incredible efforts rejects the poison of slavery, gaining freedom of choice through difficult trials. And the breath of this freedom fills his weary heart with anticipation of imminent happiness, which no one can take away. Comparison with a lion helps to feel a powerful surge of strength that makes him invulnerable to dangers.
And indeed, in the future no one will encroach on his freedom, but the premonition of imminent happiness will turn out to be deceptive, because the painful memories of bitter losses will remain with him forever.

What a pity that this story, which was not written for children at all, quietly left the adult reader, and returning to it largely depends on the desire to reread, which is born or dies in our lessons.

Option I is about Tatyana, option 2 is about Kapito.

Individual task: expressive reading based on the roles of Gavrila’s dialogues with Kapiton and Tatiana.

Enable Effects

1 of 23

Disable effects

View similar

Embed code

In contact with

Classmates

Telegram

Reviews

Add your review

Register to add a review.

Abstract for the presentation

Presentation on the topic “Lesson on the story by I.S. Turgenev “Mumu” ​​tells about the history of the creation of the story by the Russian writer Ivan Turgenev “Mumu”, the prototype of the main character. Also given are epithet, comparison, hyperbole, and independent work is also given.

1. Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev
2. History of the story
3. Plot
4. Right answers
5. Visual and expressive means
6. Independent work

Format

pptx (powerpoint)

Number of slides

Tsepeleva S.N.

Audience

Words

Abstract

Present

Purpose

• To conduct a lesson by a teacher

  To conduct a test / verification work

Slide 1

Slide 2

Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev

Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev

Slide 3

Moscow, st. Ostozhenka, 37 - House of Varvara Petrovna Turgeneva, the writer’s mother, where the heroes of the story “Mumu” ​​lived.

Slide 4

History of the story

In 1852 N.V. died. Gogol. With this tragic event, I.S. Turgenev was also greatly surprised by the fact that there was a ban on any mention of Gogol in the press. However, Turgenev managed to publish an obituary in the Moskovskie Vedomosti newspaper, for which he was punished: taken under arrest and sent under supervision to his homeland. While under arrest, Ivan Sergeevich continued to work and wrote the story “Mumu”.

Slide 5

A prototype (from the Greek prototype) is a real person, whose appearance, behavior, and life events served as the basis for the author to create the image of a literary hero.

Slide 6

• Varvara Petrovna Turgeneva
• The lady from the story by I.S. Turgenev "Mumu"

Slide 7

Prototype image of the main character

The prototype of the image of Gerasim was the mute janitor Andrei, who lived with Varvara Petrovna Lutovinova, the writer’s mother. He was “a handsome man with light brown hair and blue eyes, of enormous height and with the same strength, he lifted 10 pounds. The insults that Gerasim suffered from his mistress almost completely repeat the insults inflicted on the real janitor Andrey. Andrei, unlike Gerasim, served the lady until the end of his life, and was faithful to her even after the dog died.

Slide 8

• Janitor Gerasim
• Serf peasant of the writer's mother

Slide 9

Plot (from French subject) is a series of events occurring in a work of art.

Slide 10

Slide 11

Slide 12

Right answers:

1. No (lived in the village)
2. No (Kapiton Klimov)
3. No (saw Tatyana off)
4. No (returned to the village)
5. No (one year)
6. No (there were children) who lived in another city)
7. No (tireless work – work without fatigue)

Slide 13

Quiz based on the work of I.S. Turgenev "Mumu"

Slide 14

“...the most remarkable person was...” I.S. Turgenev

• Who was the writer talking about?

Slide 15

Why did the writer give his hero the name Gerasim?

Gerasim – “significant”, i.e. large in size, size; important in meaning; having weight, influence.

Slide 16

How tall is Gerasim?

• "... twelve inches tall"
• Vershok is an ancient measure of length equal to 4.4 centimeters.
• Arshin is an ancient measure of length equal to 0.711 meters.
• 2 arshins + 12 vershoks = 195.5 cm

Slide 17

• What role did Gerasim play in the lady’s house?

1. kept the yard clean (janitor)
2. guarded the house (watchman)

• How did he work?

1. “in half an hour he had everything ready”
2. "carried out his duties diligently"
3. "worked tirelessly"

• Where did Gerasim live?

1. had separate housing (closet)

Slide 18

• Why did the lady take Gerasim to her Moscow house?

1. “considered the most serviceable draft man”
2. “he was a nice guy”
3. "worked for four"

• How did the other servants treat him?

1. "They were afraid of him"

Slide 19

Why I.S. Did Turgenev make his hero mute?

Let's work with the textbook:

• With. 244 – statement by literary critic Yu. Seleznev

(literary critic - a scientist who studies literary works).

Slide 20

Why did Gerasim agree with the lady’s demand and drown Mumu, whom he loved very much?

Slide 21

• How to treat Gerasim I.S. Turgenev?

“..the most remarkable person was the janitor Gerasim...”

• How does the writer express his attitude towards the hero?

IVS - means of artistic expression (comparisons, hyperboles, epithets)

Slide 22

Visual and expressive means

• An epithet is an artistic definition that emphasizes the unusual properties of an object.
• Comparison is the depiction of one object by comparison with another.
• Hyperbole - gross exaggeration

Slide 23

Independent work:

• find examples of temporary detention facilities in Gerasim’s description.

View all slides

Abstract

Secondary school No. 3 in Kamyshlov.

Student messages.

1 message.

2 message.

Final words from the teacher.

Developer: Tsepeleva S.N., teacher of Russian language and literature MOU
Secondary school No. 3 in Kamyshlov.

Goal: to form in students a holistic understanding of the life and work of V.K. Kuchelbecker

1. introduce the Lyceum period of the poet’s life;
2. develop the ability to perceive spoken speech and determine the influence of life events on the writer’s work;
3. to cultivate a sense of pride in the glorious name of the poet Kuchelbecker.

Today in class we will meet one of Pushkin’s friends from the Tsarskoye Selo Lyceum, Wilhelm Karlovich Kuchelbecker, and learn about the Lyceum period of the poet’s life and his work.

Student messages.

1 message.

Wilhelm Karlovich Kuchelbecker - writer and Decembrist, was brought up at the Tsarskoye Selo Lyceum with Pushkin, Delvig, Korf and others, did well in the sciences and was distinguished by his extraordinary good nature, immense vanity, unbridled imagination, which he called poetry, irritability, which could be used in bad and good side. He was thin, lanky, awkward, and spoke in a drawling manner with a German accent...

However, despite everything, Kuchelbecker established himself as an excellent student. Many memories of Wilhelm’s oddities have reached us, but his erudition, knowledge of languages, and originality of judgment won him the respect of his comrades. Among the lyceum student's interests are history and philosophy, oriental languages ​​and folklore and, of course, poetry - German, English, French - and drama, and the desire and ability to defend his own view of poetry could not but arouse the respect of his comrades. Upon graduation from the Lyceum, Kuchelbecker received a third silver medal and an excellent certificate.

Subsequently, Kuchelbecker served briefly in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; taught Russian and Latin at the Pedagogical Institute. In 1820, he gave public lectures in Paris on Russian literature, which he had to stop at the request of the Russian embassy. In 1821 - 1822 he served under Yermolov in the Caucasus, where he met Griboyedov. He spent 1823 - 1824 in Moscow, giving lessons and studying literature (together with Prince V.F. Odoevsky he published the collection “Mnemosyne”, (1824). The radical mood brought Kuchelbecker closer to some participants in the Northern Society, but Kuchelbecker was not a member of it On December 14, he got involved by accident, “got drunk at someone else’s feast,” as Pushkin put it. On Senate Square, he attempted the life of Grand Duke Mikhail Pavlovich, fled from St. Petersburg, was captured in Warsaw, tried and sentenced to death, commuted to 15 years’ imprisonment. in the fortress and then exiled to the settlement. After spending nine years in the fortresses of European Russia, Kuchelbecker was sent to live in Barguzin in 1835. He died in Tobolsk.

2 message.

Unbalanced, sensitive, eternally enthusiastic, Kuchelbecker was a model of a romantic in life and in literature. Kuchelbecker was very loved and respected. His poems contained a lot of thought and feeling, but also a lot of cloying.

Terribly touchy, exploding like gunpowder, he was also the subject of constant ridicule from his comrades. Pushkin said about him: “a sensible man with a pen in his hands, although he is a madman.”

Pushkin loved Kuchelbecker, but mocked him cruelly. (video)

Pushkin accepted the challenge. Both fired, but the pistols were loaded with cranberries, and the matter ended in nothing...

I recognized exile, I recognized prison,
I recognized the darkness of the dawnless blindness,
And the terrible conscience learned reproaches,
And I feel sorry for the slave of my dear homeland.
Final words from the teacher.

Despite all the obstacles in Kuchelbecker’s fate, today we remember him as a wonderful lyceum student, poet and writer, whose works fill the treasure trove of classical literature. Today we met only one of A.S.’s friends. Pushkin, in the next lesson we will learn about the rest of our friends - lyceum students.

Download abstract

“Asya Turgenev” - The Tale “Asya” (1858). V.A. Nedzvetsky. V.G.Perov. Portrait of I.S. Turgenev. 1872. TURGENEV Ivan Sergeevich (1818-83), Russian writer. Municipal educational institution Tominsk secondary school. 2009 – 2010 academic year. Turgenev Ivan Sergeevich Tale "Asya". Prepared by Chuiduk N.A., teacher of Russian language and literature of the first category.

“Bazarov” - Bazarov about Pavel Petrovich. But, despite the collapse of his ideals, Bazarov evokes great respect. Episode of the duel. N.N. Strakh. And Kukshina ended up abroad. Pavel Petrovich trembled slightly and grabbed his thigh with his hand. 1) Bazarov 2) Arkady 3) Nikolai Petrovich 4) Pavel Petrovich. Satire. Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev.

“Turgenev Fathers and Sons” - Teacher of Russian language and literature. Municipal educational institution secondary school No. 2 ZATO village Solnechny Olovyannikova Elena Petrovna. This is the ideal harmony of existence in Turgenev’s imagination. Collect information about Evgeny Bazarov. 2nd group. 1 group. Arkady Kirsanov. 5 group. P. Weil, A. Genis. Pavel Petrovich Nikolai Petrovich Old Men Bazarovs Odintsova.

“The Life and Work of Turgenev” - Review of creativity. Issues for discussion. Magazine "Russian Bulletin". Adulthood. Project topics. Childhood. Turgenev's guests in Spassky-Lutovinovo were A. A. Fet, M. S. Shchepkin, N. A. Nekrasov. The Lutovinov family. The writer's mother. In 1836, Turgenev completed the course with the degree of a full student. Main goals and objectives.

“Turgenev the writer” - The last years of his life. What new did you learn from the writer’s biography? Literature lesson in 10th grade. The early years of the writer. Creativity of I.S. Turgenev. In 1880, Turgenev took part in the celebrations in honor of the opening of the monument to Pushkin in Moscow. Lesson objectives: Question: P.L. Lavrov. Writer's creativity. And again work. Works of the writer.

“Ivan Turgenev” - Traces of Lutovin’s antiquity clearly appear in Turgenev’s works. The rooms are painted in different colors. There, the air seems to be “full of thoughts”!.. “When will you be a child with a child…”. In front of the façade there were lush flower beds with figured flower beds. Brothers. Ivan Turgenev at the age of 12.

There are a total of 43 presentations in the topic