View of the estate from the pond

I visited the former estate of Altufievo on one of my first frequent visits to Moscow. I received a "tip" in the book "The Wreath of Moscow Estates" by T.V. Muravyova, which she also acquired one of the first, bought in Moscow.

Now I often pass by the estate, taking a taxi from Sheremetyevo to my usual stop in the Mother See. True, at the exit from the Moscow Ring Road to Altufevskoye Shosse, the house is not visible, you can only see the church and the former manor pond. And yet now, every time I drive by, I remember the openwork building, hiding somewhere among the branches.

The architecture of the house is very unusual, given that it was built long before the spread of fashion for the "Russian style"

A small nice house in the depths of a slightly neglected garden at the time of my visit was being repaired in some places, however, fortunately for me (and maybe for the house), it was not surrounded by scaffolding, so I managed to examine it in detail and take quite tolerable photos. This material has been gathering dust unclaimed since the summer, and now I decided to take it on. I found (Oh, horror! What am I going to write about ?!), a very detailed and, I must say, very interesting story about the estate and its history from the respected Mikhail Korobko ( lugerovski ). I won’t rewrite it, it’s not good somehow, I just recommend that you read the source, I’ll give the link at the end.

Flower garden in the estate

I myself decided to write about what interested me when studying various sources about the history of the estate.
The estate has been mentioned in documents since the 16th century. During this time, the manor house was rebuilt several times and changed its appearance. We will return to this issue later, and now we will turn to the names of some of the owners of the estate. Below is an incomplete list of successive owners of Altufiev, which Mikhail Korobko talks about in some detail, I will only list them:

Restless Dmitrievich Myakishev - the first "documented" owner,
Arkhip and Ivan Fedorovich Akinfov
Nikita Ivanovich Akinfov;
Nikolai Kanbarovich Akinfov (grandson of Nikolai Ivanovich)
Yuri Nikolaevich Akinfov
Ivan Ivanovich Velyaminov
Matvey Fedorovich Apraksin
Natalya Fedorovna Bruce-Kolycheva
Andrey Andreevich Rinder
Stepan Borisovich Kurakin
Dmitry Ivanovich Priklonsky
Nikolay Artemyevich Zherebtsov
Glafira Ivanovna Alfeeva
…a few more hosts
Georgy Martynovich Lianozov.

Almost every name has an interesting story that could be devoted to a separate story, but I want to touch on a topic that indirectly unites two of the indicated surnames; and this topic is Peter the Great.

I was interested in Nikolai Akinfiev and his, frankly speaking, not particularly successful fate. He was married to Xenia (Aksinya) Avraamovna Lopukhina, aunt of Evdokia Lopukhina, empress, wife of Peter the Great. In the literature about the time of Peter the Great and even in the cinema (“Peter the Great” by Gerasimov, for example), and in many historical and pseudo-historical documents, the unflattering definition of “a seedy family” is often used when mentioning the name of the Lopukhins. This is rather strange, since the family is quite old, originating from the Kosozh prince Rededi, who was killed in the 11th century by Mstislav the Brave (remember, I wrote about them in a post about). To kill him, he killed him, and then gave his daughter to his son Rededi; reconcile, you see, I decided with the scythes. Since then, the Lopukhins have been leading their pedigree. (Imagine - the living Lopukhins belong to the 27th tribe!). Representatives of the family have been at the court since time immemorial - both under Ivan Kalita there was the boyar Lopukhin, and under Shuisky, and they especially rose under the first Romanovs. True, under the father of Peter the Great, the Lopukhins “got along” in order - Abraham Nikitich Lopukhin at first was just a “tenant”, and this was not the highest court rank. His son, the parent of Evdokia, Illarion Avraamovich was originally a roundabout - an enviable rank, but not yet boyar. Already intermarried with the king, the family reached the very heights of the court hierarchy. The Lopukhins were incredibly prolific - even Evdokia managed to give birth to Peter three sons, although they did not live together for long (two sons died in infancy, the rest, as you know, ended badly). I don’t know whether such family fertility indicates something - whether it is a manifestation of an extraordinary hereditary temperament and energy, but it, apparently, did not particularly contribute to the accumulation of wealth: try to feed a crowd of children! Father Evdokia Illarion (later renamed Fyodor) Avraamovich had 5 brothers and 3 sisters. Nikita Akinfov was married to one of the sisters.
He cannot be accused of greed and pragmatism - having married Xenia (and this was already his second marriage), he did not even imagine that representatives of the royal house would someday be his relatives - the wedding took place in 1672, in the year of the birth of Peter the Great, his future wife Dunechka at that time was only 3 years old. From the royal marriage, Akinfov, rather, lost than won. Akinfov would have cooked jam with his wife in a country house, would have played with grandchildren, great-grandchildren and would not have known grief if he had not become a relative of the restless Pyotr Alekseevich without any influence on what was happening!

I found the house in a state of repair

And what about the Lopukhins? By the end of the reign of Alexei Mikhailovich, the Lopukhins already occupied a rather high position - Illarion Avraamovich was the butler of Tsarina Natalya Kirillovna, and in honor of the birth of the prince, he was finally promoted to Duma boyar. Natalya Kirillovna, who communicated daily with Lopukhin and, most likely, knew his family, noticed her butler's pretty daughter and chose her as a bride for her young son. At that time, they did not discuss such issues with mothers, Peter meekly agreed to the marriage.

Natalya Kirillovna, who belonged to another large family of controversial nobility, was a lady, perhaps not the smartest, but certainly not a simpleton - the Naryshkins have always been distinguished by sophistication in intrigues and pragmatism. Having chosen Lopukhina, she pursued several goals: firstly, at that time the confrontation with Sophia, who was still ruling, reached its very heat. Marriage with a representative of a large family attracted a crowd of new relatives as supporters of the "Naryshkin" group. By the way, here Natalya Kirillovna did not fail - Evdokia's uncle Peter Avraamovich was one of the first to bring his regiments to the Trinity when Peter and his young wife needed protection (this did not prevent the nephew from later executing a relative). The second reason, perhaps the most important, was the desire of the queen's widow to get heirs from her son as soon as possible. The tsar-stepson, co-ruler of Peter, Ivan Alekseevich was already married, his wife was expecting a child - this was a serious threat in the event of an ongoing squabble for the throne. The third reason was also important for the queen - she was afraid that Peter would completely "Germanize" because of his frequent visits to Kukuy, which irritated her. Having married him to Evdokia, who was brought up on patriarchal principles, she hoped to ward off her son from the “demonic” settlement with her cheerful, sociable frauleins and endless booze. Almost immediately after the wedding, a noisy crowd of hungry Lopukhins, who had previously vegetated in secondary roles, rushed to the sovereign trough. Apparently, among the nobility, the unceremonious relatives of the young queen were not particularly popular. As Prince Kurakin wrote about them, “... people are evil, stingy tell-tales, the lowest minds and who do not know the least about getting around the yard ... And by that time everyone hated them and began to argue that if they came to mercy, they would destroy everyone and take over the state. And, in short, they were hated by everyone and everyone was looking for evil or danger from them.

Peter the First. Engraving by an unknown artist (I think Peter looks puzzled and even a little scared here)

Especially “hearty pieces” from the royal table went to the representatives of the family after the final accession of Peter, all the uncles received the boyars, posts and lands, but the holiday on their street did not last long. The first victims were members of the family in the struggle for power with their own former comrades-in-arms, supporters of Peter in the fight against Sophia. In 1695, 6 years after Peter's wedding, the tsar's uncle Lev Kirillovich Naryshkin, another noble intriguer, wrote a denunciation of the tsarina's uncle, the already mentioned Pyotr Avraamovich Lopukhin - well, uncles were not friends with each other! What was written in the denunciation is unknown, but this caused the anger of the king. By his decree, Lopukhin was tortured, after which he died the next day. By that time, a cooling had already begun in the relationship between Peter and Evdokia, so the quick-tempered monarch did not stand on ceremony with the relatives of the queen.

Two years after the death of Pyotr Avraamovich (he was, by the way, Peter the Great and had a nickname Lapka, there was also Small) in 1697, in connection with the Zikler-Sokovin case, Peter suspected the remaining uncles of the tsarina of unreliability and exiled their remote provinces: his father-in-law Fyodor Avraamovich - governor in Totma; Vasily Avraamovich - to Saransk; Kuzma Avraamovich - to Sharonda, Sergei Avraamovich - to Vyazma. Even then, the tsar decided to send Evdokia Feodorovna to a monastery, which he did a year later. In the same year, Peter Avraamovich Lesser Lopukhin, another uncle of the tsarina, died. He repeated the tragic path of his elder brother-namesake - he died under torture. Peter "pissed" at him because of the complaint of the priests of the Archangel Cathedral, who handed over the petition to the tsar. In fact, they complained not about Lopukhin himself, but about his manager, they say "he kills peasants to death of her (Cathedral Church), but there is no trial against him." It is not clear who actually killed whom, but Pyotr Avraamovich paid for it with his life.

Obviously, the fall of the Lopukhins was associated with the queen's disgrace, but some members of the family still remained at court. True, in the main, these were her very distant relatives. Among the royal stewards under Peter, the Lopukhins' pedigree includes Alexei Andreevich, Stepan Ivanovich, Fyodor Leontyevich, Fyodor Kuzmich, Ivan Petrovich Lopukhins.

Another blow overtook the family in 1718 in connection with the "case of Tsarevich Alexei."
Peter has not seen his ex-wife for more than 20 years, but he tried to communicate with his son. I will not retell the story of Peter's relationship with his son, on the one hand, it is well known to everyone, on the other hand, there are many ambiguities in it. I will only express my attitude to this story, my opinion.

Peter became a father at the age of 18. Even for that century, when men matured early, this is a very young age for fatherhood - at that time, Peter was only interested in naval fun and parties in Kukuyskaya Sloboda. From the very birth of the child, Peter practically did not communicate with him - this was not accepted, and, apparently, it was not interesting for Peter. At the age of 8, Alexei was taken away from his mother, he was surrounded by strangers and often hostile people. During rare meetings, the prince could only be horrified by his father's explosive character, his nervous tic, gigantic growth, his booming bass, his exorbitant and often incomprehensible demands for the prince. Often the tsarevich was beaten by his father and sometimes even by his close associates (in particular, Menshikov, who at one time was entrusted with raising the tsar's son, beat him even in the presence of Peter). Judging by the documents, although Aleksey was educated, his education was unsystematic and one-sided; the young man was early taught to drink. He read a lot, but these were mostly spiritual books. Mechanics, the fleet, military sciences, unlike his father, did not interest him, but rather repelled him. The prince grew up as a nervous, withdrawn young man, mortally afraid and not loving his father. Moreover, this dislike was definitely mutual. It seems that Peter did not experience any paternal feelings for an unloved son from an unloved woman. His attempts to make Alexei his like-minded and comrade-in-arms are explained not by his father's love, but by his duty - the king needed an heir who, over time, could transfer the throne and entrust the continuation of the great things that had begun. Having already matured, Alexei continued to avoid meeting with his father, trying to come up with any excuse to be away from him. This irritated the tsar and gave rise to unpleasant suspicions - the tsarevich was already at the "throne" age, there were a lot of people dissatisfied with Peter's policy, Alexei could easily become a tool in their hands. Starting an investigation into the case of the prince, Peter, I think, was struck by the scale of discontent among those close to him - the list of suspects included the names of the courtiers of the first circle, the closest ones whom the king trusted. The massacre, as you know, was terrible. The tsarevich, who had become a dangerous rival, was doomed, especially since the tsar already had another heir - Catherine's son Tsarevich Petr Petrovich.

Tsarevich Alexei (B.K. Franke)

I did not find reliable documents confirming that Alexei was a worthy son and heir - his personality looks pathetic and not always attractive. However, I do not justify Peter - he was a bad father for Alexei, it just so happened. There are a lot of bad fathers now: many men, having rashly married at a young age, subsequently leave their wives with small children in order to never remember them again. After many years, others may accidentally find out that Ivan Ivanovich, respected by everyone, somewhere has a son from his first marriage, whom he has never seen. Remember, you probably have such acquaintances. Probably, at one time you were surprised: “Ai-yay-yay! But he is an authoritative scientific worker recognized by all!” (general, cynologist, artist, director, tsar, etc. - I don’t know who your friend works for).

Let us return to the disgraced Lopukhins. They, of course, supported Alexei and secretly hoped for the return of his mother Evdokia from exile. Moreover, it was quite clear that during the life of Peter this is not feasible. They did not have the slightest reason to wish the king long life - one after another, family members fell into disgrace or died on the block, no one wanted to be next. In addition, their relative, the former queen, the legitimate wife of the king, was insulted and expelled.
The tsar refused to support his ex-wife, they supported Evdokia in the Lopukhins monastery, moreover, they supported him very tangibly - during a search, rich worldly dresses, expensive utensils, furs and jewelry were found among her things. The Lopukhins initiated the maintenance of secret correspondence between mother and son, and their only meeting was arranged through their efforts. True, this meeting was immediately reported to Peter, and he brought down his anger on the prince, after which Alexei was so frightened that he refused further meetings and even correspondence with his mother.

Preparation for execution by wheeling

And the family murmured and whispered. It is for this murmuring and whispering, by and large, that the participants in the “conspiracy of Tsarevich Alexei” suffered. They did not intend to kill the king, they only wanted him dead, and this, according to the laws of that time, was as much a crime as an actual conspiracy.

The tsarina's brother Abraham Fedorovich Lopukhin suffered the most. He was tortured several times and then executed. His involvement was found out by finding his correspondence with his sister. In fact, he was only to blame for the fact that, unfortunately, he turned out to be a compassionate brother - most of all he supported his sister in every possible way, told her news in letters, worried about his nephew. Having learned about the flight of the prince, he, not being involved in it, inadvertently discussed with other suspects the situation of the prince and rejoiced at his salvation.
Another participant in the conspiracy, Alexander Kikin, was wheeled.
Other Lopukhins also suffered.

Evdokia's sister Anastasia Fedorovna was tortured during the interrogation. Another Lopukhin, Stepan Ivanovich, passing on the case of the prince, was exiled to permanent residence in the Kola jail. Illarion Semenovich Lopukhin was sent to the Solovetsky Monastery.

As for Nikita Akinfov, the wife of Xenia Avraamovna, the tsarina's aunt, the degree of his participation in the conspiracy is not clear. I did not find information about whether Xenia herself was involved and punished, but her wife was forcibly tonsured to the Kirillo-Belozersky Monastery, and this happened already in 1721, 5 years after the start of the investigation. It looks like he himself was involved in the case. In general, there is very little information about him. It is known that he was devious and owned, in addition to Altufievo, several more villages: the villages of Sergiev, Komyagin, etc.

An even greater involvement in the prince's case was discovered by the son of Xenia and Nikita - a guy with a strange name Kanbar. He was a steward and county councilor (landrat). Abraham Lopukhin betrayed him under torture, and Kanbar's arrest took place after Abraham's execution. Apparently, Peter had already calmed down a bit - after all, the investigation was almost over, so the punishment was already more lenient. Kanbar Akinfov was not even tortured at first, so they only scared him a little - they made him undress and stand near the rack, and then they let him go to the cell and ordered him to write everything he knew. True, later he received 15 blows. After the investigation, he was sentenced to be beaten with a whip and exiled to Siberia in 1718. Peter canceled the beating at the last moment, and Kanbar went into exile unbeaten. Apparently, he did not return from exile, since his father Nikita Ivanovich left his lands not to him, but to his grandson Nikolai. He also got Altufyevo. Initially, all the estates of Nikita Akinfov were alienated to the treasury, but later Peter allowed them to be inherited by the one whom the exile pointed to. Nikita Ivanovich, now monk Ioaniky, pointed to his grandson, since his son was also in exile. True, there was also a daughter, whose husband later sued his nephew for the right to inherit.

These are the whirlwinds and hurricanes of history once circling over a modest estate.
And I will tell the story of the second surname associated with Peter the Great

In 1750, Ivan Yurievich Trubetskoy died. With his death, the era of the Russian boyars ended, the history of the clans that had served in the public service for centuries. It is interesting to remember their history today ...

Trubetskoy

The princes Trubetskoy belong to the Gediminovich dynasty, the descendants of the Grand Dukes of Lithuania. Representatives of this family went to the service of the Moscow Grand Dukes at the beginning of the 15th century.

By the end of the 17th century, Russia was already serving the ninth generation of this kind, whose representatives occupied the highest posts in the state: they were appointed governors, heads of orders, in embassies to foreign sovereigns.

In the "History of the birth of the Russian nobility" Ivan Yuryevich is called the last Russian boyar, in this capacity he was still surrounded by the young Peter I. Ivan Yuryevich was a long-liver, he died at the age of 83.

Ivan Yurievich Trubetskoy

Ivan Yurievich spent 18 years of his long life in Swedish captivity. He got there at the very beginning of the Northern War. The father of two daughters, had as sons-in-law the Moldavian ruler Dmitry Cantemir and Prince Ludwig-Wilhelm of Hesse-Homburg, Field Marshal.

In captivity, Ivan Yuryevich from Baroness Wrede gave birth to a son, who was named Ivan. Ivan Ivanovich Betskoy became a famous educator and teacher of the times of Catherine II, the founder and first president of the Academy of Arts.

Velyaminovs

The family originates from Shimon (Simon), the son of the Varangian prince Afrikan. In 1027 he arrived in the army of Yaroslav the Great and converted to Orthodoxy.

Shimon Afrikanovich is famous for participating in the battle with the Polovtsy on Alta and making the largest donation for the construction of the Caves Church in honor of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary: the precious belt and legacy of his father is a golden crown.

But the Velyaminovs were known not only for their courage and generosity: a descendant of the family, Ivan Velyaminov, fled to the Horde in 1375, but was later captured and executed on the Kuchkov field.

Coat of arms of the Velyaminovs

Despite the betrayal of Ivan Velyaminov, the family did not lose its significance: the last son of Dimitri Donskoy was baptized by Maria, the widow of Vasily Velyaminov, a Moscow thousand.

Detail: Muscovites are still reminded of the most noble Moscow family of the Vorontsov-Velyaminovs by the name of the street “Vorontsovo Pole”.

Morozov

Fragment of a painting by V.I. Surikov "Boyar Morozova"

Ivan Morozov did not leave male offspring and turned out to be the last representative of a noble boyar family that ceased to exist in the early 80s of the 17th century.

Detail: The heraldry of the Russian dynasties took shape under Peter I, which is probably why the coat of arms of the Morozov boyars was not preserved.

Baturlins

Coat of arms of the Buturlin family

“My great-grandfather Racha served St. Nevsky as a muscle of battle,” wrote A.S. Pushkin in the poem "My Genealogy". Radsha became the ancestor of fifty Russian noble families in Tsarist Moscow, among them are the Pushkins, the Buturlins, and the Myatlevs...

But let us return to the Buturlin family: its representatives faithfully served first the grand dukes, then the sovereigns of Moscow and Russia. Their family gave Russia many prominent, honest, noble people, whose names are still known. Let's name just a few of them.

Ivan Mikhailovich Buturlin served as a roundabout under Boris Godunov, fought in the North Caucasus and Transcaucasia, conquered almost all of Dagestan. He died in battle in 1605 as a result of betrayal and deceit by the Turks and mountain foreigners.

Ivan Ivanovich Buturlin

Ivan Ivanovich Buturlin was awarded the title of St. Andrew's Cavalier, General-in-Chief, Ruler of Little Russia for military and peaceful deeds. In 1721, he actively participated in the signing of the Treaty of Nystadt, which put an end to the long war with the Swedes, for which Peter I awarded him the rank of general.

Vasily Vasilyevich Buturlin was a butler under Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich, having done a lot for the reunification of Ukraine and Russia.

Sheremetevs

The Sheremetev family is descended from Andrey Kobyla. The fifth generation (great-great-grandson) of Andrei Kobyla was Andrei Konstantinovich Bezzubtsev, nicknamed Sheremet, from whom the Sheremetevs descended.

According to some versions, the surname is based on the Turkic-Bulgarian “sheremet” (“poor fellow”) and the Turkic-Persian “shir-muhammad” (“pious, brave Muhammad”).

Coat of arms of the Sheremetevs. Fragment of the lattice gate of the Sheremetev Palace.

The Sheremetevs took part in the wars with Lithuania and the Crimean Khan, in the Livonian War and the Kazan campaigns. Estates in Moscow, Yaroslavl, Ryazan, Nizhny Novgorod counties complained about their service.

Lopukhins

Evdokia Fedorovna Lopukhina, Empress. The first wife of Tsar Peter I until 1698

The outstanding family of the Lopukhins gave the Fatherland 11 governors, 9 governors-general and governors who ruled 15 provinces, 13 generals, 2 admirals. Lopukhins served as ministers and senators, headed the Cabinet of Ministers and the State Council.

Aksakovs

They come from the noble Varangian Shimon (in baptism Simon) Afrikovich or Ofrikovich - the nephew of the Norwegian king Gakon the Blind. Simon Afrikanovich arrived in Kyiv in 1027 with a retinue of three thousand and built at his own expense the Church of the Assumption of the Mother of God in the Kiev-Pechersk Lavra, where he was buried.

The coat of arms of the Aksakovs was included in the fourth part of the "General Armorial"49, approved by Emperor Paul on December 7, 1799.

The surname of the Oksakovs (in the old days), and now the Aksakovs, came from one of his descendants, Ivan the Lame.
The word "oksak" means "lame" in Turkic languages.

link

Some Lopukhins are an untitled Russian noble family, from the Kasogian prince Rededi and his descendant Vasily Lopukha, the coat of arms of the family is in the 3rd part of the "General Armorial of the Noble Families of the Russian Empire". The Lopukhins family is included in the 6th part of the noble genealogical books of the Vladimir, Kiev, Moscow, Novgorod, Oryol, Pskov, Tver and Tula provinces.
Additional Information. Some nobles of the late 19th century with this surname. At the end of the line - the province and county to which they are assigned.
Lopukhin, Bor. Aldr., Zemsk. early Orlovsk. u., Orel. Oryol province. Maloarkhangelsky district. gg. nobles who have the right to vote.
Lopukhin, Vikt. Iv., ks. Oryol province. Karachev district. gg. nobles who have the right to elect directly and have a vote in all positions of the province. Meetings.
Lopukhin, Nikl. Iv., village Golovkovo. Smolensk province. Sychevsky district.
Lopukhina, Maria. Vladimir province. Gorohovets county.
Lopukhina, Nat. Os., village Golovkovo. Smolensk province. Sychevsky district.

On the 1st section of the cemetery of the Donskoy Monastery in Moscow are buried:
LOPUKHIN ALEXEY ALEKSANDROVICH 1813-1873 (see), friend of M.Yu. Lermontov
LOPUKHIN ALEXANDER?-1787, ensign
LOPUKHINA VARVARA ALEKSANDROVNA 1819-1873
LOPUKHINA EKATERINA ANDREEVNA, baby
LOPUKHINA EKATERINA 1835-1841
On the 6th section of the cemetery of the Donskoy Monastery in Moscow are buried:
LOPUKHINA LIDIIA ALEXEEVNA 1842-1895
LOPUKHINA MARIA ALEKSANDROVNA 1802-1877, friend of M.Yu. Lermontov, sister No. 1
LOPUKHINA MARIA ALEKSEEVNA 1840-1886
In addition, the tomb of the Lopukhins is located in the Spaso-Andronikov Monastery.

Genus. 06/30/1670, mind. 08/27/1731.
She was the first wife of Tsar Peter 1. The wedding took place on January 27, 1689. It was the last marriage of the Sovereign with his compatriot in Russian history.
Evdokia was chosen as the bride of Peter by his mother, Tsaritsa Natalya Kirillovna, without the consent of the groom. This was done in view of the Naryshkins' long-standing ties with the Lopukhins and in the hope of their help in strengthening the position of Tsar Peter as the sovereign Sovereign (by that time the Lopukhins occupied a prominent position among the nobility and in the army). The correctness of the choice was confirmed during the confrontation between Princess Sophia and Tsar Peter.
The first years of marriage were relatively quiet. In February 1690, Tsarevich Alexei was born, and a year later - Alexander, who died at the age of 1 year. Unlike some historians and writers, we would not like to see the traditional reason for unsuccessful family life in the fact that the Tsarina could not understand and accept Tsar Peter's aspirations for the reorganization of Russia, which, by the way, were formed much later.
The point of view of the historian N.M. Kostomarov, who believes that the cooling in family relations occurred for a much more prosaic reason, which lies in the connection arranged by Lefort between the Tsar and his previous favorite Anna Mons in order to strengthen his influence on the young Sovereign and promote the interests of foreigners in Russia. Tsar Peter became attached with all his heart to Anna Mons, who ultimately betrayed him with the ease traditional for a courtesan.
From the correspondence of the Queen it is clear that she experienced this change with pain, about which she complained to her relatives, and they expressed dissatisfaction with the actions of the Tsar. These complaints reached the Sovereign, but for about 4 years the Lopukhins were not touched. In 1697, before the Tsar’s trip abroad, in connection with the discovery of the conspiracy of Sokovnin, Tsykler and Pushkin, a reason was found for the exile of the Tsaritsa’s father and his two brothers, the boyars Sergei and Vasily, by governors away from Moscow, without any reason. Tsar Peter was afraid of the formation of the opposition in his absence and the participation of the Lopukhins in it.
At the same time, the first thought arises to obtain the voluntary consent of the Tsaritsa to be tonsured as a nun. She refuses, citing her son's infancy and his need for her. However, upon the return of Peter and a conversation with him, she was forcibly taken to the Suzdal Intercession Monastery, where in 1698, again by force, she was tonsured under the name of Elena and created very difficult conditions for life.
She was not only separated from her son, but was also not allowed to see him, which subsequently led to the need for secret relations and played a tragic role in the fate of not only them, but also the Queen’s relatives, leading some to torture, some to exile, and some to scaffold.
It also deprived Russia of a rightful heir to the throne, who suffered a painful death, the prologue to which was "one of the cases that Russia has not seen for its Tsars for more than a century." "The moral concepts of Russians in those days could not but arouse among the people censures of Peter's deed." There are several folk songs created on this occasion and popular at the time. “20 years later, when the violence against Empress Eudoxia turned into a new terrible search, the unfortunate Bishop Dositheus, betrayed to torture, said: “Only I got caught in this, look what is on everyone’s hearts.” “Peter, by his act with his wife, offended the Orthodox Church because she, the Church, alone had the God-given right to pronounce judgment between husband and wife."
When, in 1718, Peter needed to get rid of his son now, he again begins an investigation about the disgraced Queen, wanting to compromise her. Therefore, she is remembered by everything and even the love that arose after many years of imprisonment for Stepan Glebov and the connection with him, for which the latter was subjected to a painful execution by a stake. Having obtained a letter of repentance from Evdokia and not daring to physically eliminate her, Tsar Peter transfers the Tsarina under strict supervision to the Ladoga Assumption Monastery, where she remains until the death of the Sovereign.
With the accession of Catherine I, she is imprisoned in the Shlisselburg fortress in a solitary cell with strict conditions, without the right to meet and correspond with anyone, not excluding priests. Even the guards did not know the name of their prisoner. In such conditions, Evdokia spent more than two years until she was released by her grandson Emperor Peter II - the son of Tsarevich Alexei.
The Supreme Privy Council issued a decree to restore the honor and dignity of the Empress, with the withdrawal of all documents discrediting her, and canceled its decision of 1722 on the appointment of an heir by the Emperor of his own intent, without regard to the rights to the throne. "This disturbed Menshikov and all those who were once hostile to the son of the liberated Tsaritsa and her relatives - the Lopukhins." An attempt was made to draw Evdokia into the intrigue around all this, but she found the strength to stay away. She was given the Queen's court and maintenance was assigned.
She settled in Moscow, first in the Novodevichy Convent, in the chambers she had known since childhood (the Lopukhin Chambers and the Lopukhin Tower have been preserved and still bear this name), and then moved to the Resurrection Monastery in the Kremlin. Tsarina Evdokia had to outlive her beloved grandchildren of Emperor Peter II and Grand Duchess Natalya Alekseevna.
The empress Anna Ioanovna, who reigned, also treated her with due respect and was present at the burial of Tsaritsa Evdokia in the Smolensk Cathedral of the Novodevichy Convent. Thus passed and ended the life of the last Russian Tsaritsa, who set an example, perhaps, of one of the most tragic fates of royal persons of that time.
The memory of Empress Evdokia Feodorovna has been preserved in several portraits, personal items kept in Suzdal in the Pokrovsky Monastery, numerous expensive contributions to many other monasteries and churches. It is also kept by the Church of the Archangel Michael, towering over the Spaso-Andronikov Monastery in Moscow, built at the expense of the Tsaritsa and other Lopukhins and which served for a long time as their family tomb.
In the Suzdal region of the Vladimir province. on the bank of the river Tezy is the village of Dunilovo, in which 12 churches and three monasteries have been preserved. This village in the ХVП-ХVШ centuries. owned by the Lopukhins. One of the monasteries - Annunciation - was built by the father of Empress Evdokia. There she met her son. Intercession Cathedral, also built by the Lopukhins, is the largest church with the largest parish. It contains the Miraculous Icon - a gift from Tsarina Evdokia and Tsar Peter.
Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia Alexy P, visiting Dunilovo, called it "the pearl of ancient Russia."

Name:	DECISION No. 54 On the approval of the official symbols of the municipality of the Lopukhinsky rural settlement of the Lomonosovsky municipal district of the Leningrad Region.
Date of:	22.04.2015
Document level:	Local
Document type:	Basic
Action status:	current
Regulatory status:	Normative
Compliance Status:	Corresponds to the Federal Law

COUNCIL OF DEPUTIES

MUNICIPALITY

AREA

LENINGRAD REGION

third convocation

SOLUTION No.54

On the approval of the official symbols of the municipality of the Lopukhinsky rural settlement of the Lomonosovsky municipal district of the Leningrad Region.

In accordance with Federal Law No. 131-FZ of 06.10.2003 (as amended) “On the General Principles of Organization of Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation”, the Charter of the Leningrad Region, the Council of Deputies of the Lopukhinsky rural settlement

DECIDED:

1. Accept the proposal of the team of authors consisting of: Bashkirov Konstantin Sergeevich, Karpunina Victoria Valeryevna, Steinbakh Svetlana Yuryevna, who developed sketches of the coat of arms and flag of the municipality Lopukhinskoe rural settlement of the municipality of Lomonosov municipal district of the Leningrad region and approve the Regulations on the coat of arms of the municipality of Lopukhinskoe rural settlement of the municipality of Lomonosov municipal district of the Leningrad region (Appendix No. 1) and Regulations on the flag of the Lopukhinskoye rural settlement of the Lomonosov Municipal District of the Leningrad Region (Appendix No. 2).

2. Apply to the Heraldic Council under the President of the Russian Federation in order to enter the coat of arms and flag of the Lopukhinskoye rural settlement of the Lomonosov Municipal District of the Leningrad Region in the State Heraldic Register of the Russian Federation.

Instruct Bashkirov Konstantin Sergeevich to represent the interests of the Lopukhinskoye rural settlement of the Moscow Region of the Lomonosov Municipal District of the Leningrad Region in the Heraldic Council under the President of the Russian Federation.

5. This decision comes into force after its publication.

Head of the municipality

Lopukhinskoye rural settlement Romanov Yu.G.

APPROVED

decision of the Council of Deputies

municipality

Lopukhinskoe rural settlement

MO Lomonosov municipal

district of the Leningrad region

Application No. 1

REGULATIONS ON THE COAT OF ARMS

OF THE MUNICIPALITY LOPUKHINSKY RURAL SETTLEMENT OF THE LOMONOSOV MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF LENINGRAD REGION.

This regulation establishes the coat of arms of the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement of the Lomonosov municipal district of the Leningrad region, its description and the procedure for official use.

General provisions

1.1. The coat of arms of the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement of the Lomonosovsky municipal district of the Leningrad region (hereinafter referred to as the Coat of arms) is the official symbol of the Lopukhinsky rural settlement of the Lomonosov municipal district of the Leningrad region.

1.2. The Regulations on the Coat of Arms and drawings of the Coat of Arms in multi-color and one-color versions are stored in the Council of Deputies of the Municipal Formation Lopukhinsky Rural Settlement of the Lomonosovsky Municipal District of the Leningrad Region and are available for review to all interested parties.

1.3. The coat of arms is subject to entry into the State Heraldic Register of the Russian Federation.

Heraldic description and justification of the symbols of the Coat of Arms

2.1. Heraldic description of the coat of arms:

"In a field composed of silver stones of various shapes, a scarlet (red) rising griffin."

The sides in heraldry are determined from the person holding the shield

2.2. Interpretation of the symbolism of the Coat of Arms:

14 km. Lopukhinka is located from Gostilitsy along the Kopro highway. It, like the river on which it stands, got its name from the name of the first owner, Nikita Lopukhin. Lopukhinka (6.5 hectares) with the village of Sergievsky (Bereznyaki) and the neighboring Lower Ruditsa (10 hectares), located on the opposite bank of the Lopukhinka River, at the end of the 18th century became the estate of Major General H. F. Gering and his wife Anna Mary, the daughter of the Englishman Joseph Bottom, who was invited by the Academy of Sciences as an instrument mechanic at the Peterhof Lapidary Factory and settled in Verkhnyaya Ruditsa, whom Anna Gering received as a dowry.

The ancient historical coat of arms of the Lopukhins of the 17th century: “In the white field the Red Vulture, on the Princely hat of the peacocks Tail”

Coat of arms of the nobles of the Goering family: “In the golden shield, the azure armor is turned somewhat to the right. They are covered with an azure helmet. Above the shield is a noble helmet with a crown. Crest: a hand raised up in azure armor holds a golden sword. Namet: azure with gold. The coat of arms of Goering is included in Part XIII of the “General Armorial of the Noble Families of the All-Russian Empire”, p. 159.

The book “Volosts and the most important villages of European Russia” (Issue VII) of “Provinces of the Lakeside Group” (St. Petersburg, 1885, p. 89) provides the following information about some villages of the Medushskaya volost of the Peterhof district:

“503. Old Medushi, former owner's village, yards 26, inhabitants 118, vol. board, Orthodox church, chapel, school, shop, Torzhok May 9th.

504. Foals (Zherebyatkovo), former owner's village, yards 9, inhabitants 46, Lutheran church.

505. Kizhina, former owner's village, yards 47, inhabitants 230, shop.

506. Ruditsy, a former specific village near the river. Lopukhinka, yards 15, inhabitants 68, shop.

507. Ust-Ruditsy (Lower Rtsuditsy), a former owner's village near the river. Kovashe, yards 54, inhabitants 286, a chapel, a shop”.

In the “History of the History of the Administrative-Territorial Division of the Leningrad Region (1917-1969)”, compilers: Dubin A.S., Lebedeva P.G. (LOGAV) it is said that Lopukhinka from pre-revolutionary times until February 1927 belonged to Medushskaya volost of the Peterhof (Oranienbaum) district, and from February to August 1927 was part of the Gostilitsky volost of the same district. In August 1927, the Oranienbaum (later Lomonosov District) of the newly formed Leningrad Region was created. From 1924 to 1960 Lopukhinsk as part of the Central Village Council, and in the period 1917-1924. and from 1960 to 1993 - as part of the Lopukhinsky village council.

On the territory of the Lopukhinsky rural settlement there is a geological and hydrological natural monument radon springs and lakes in the village of Lopukhinka . It is included in the Red Book of Nature of the Leningrad Region (T. 1. SPb. 1999. S. 149-150). Organized by the Decision of the Leningrad Region Executive Committee No. 145 dated March 29, 1976, at the initiative of the NWTSU and LOGS VOOP in order to protect the outlets to the surface of groundwater enriched with radon and the Ruditsa river valley. Reapproved by Decree of the Government of the Leningrad Region No. 494 dated December 26, 1996. Area - 270 hectares.

On the slope of the Baltic-Ladoga ledge (glint), the waters of the Gdov horizon of the Ordovician, which have a high content of radioactive elements, come to the day surface in the form of numerous springs. The underground waters feeding the springs are confined to fractured karst limestones occurring at a depth of 10-15 m from the modern surface. The discharge of the aquifer goes from the southeast to the northwest, that is, towards the clint. Groundwater outlets in the form of springs and springs form the source of the river. Lopukhinka. Due to the water abundance of the horizon, the springs, merging into a single stream, developed a picturesque canyon-like (up to 30 m deep) valley in the slope of the clint. In the upper reaches of the valley, two dams were built, which regulate the natural flow of springs and the river. Lopukhinka. Above the dams, two small artificial lakes formed. Distance between them - about 50 m. The length of the southwestern lake is about 200 m, the northeastern one is 550 m. The width of the lakes is 40-60 m. The color of the water in the lakes is turquoise-emerald. Springs that form the flow of the river. Lopukhinka, have mineral radon qualities, and their waters in terms of chemical composition are bicarbonate calcium-magnesium, fresh, with a mineralization of 0.3-0.5 g / l, and with a high content of radon (100-180 emanations, with a normal background - 5 -7 emanations). These indicators allow us to consider these mineral waters as healing, they can be used for medicinal purposes. Below the dam on the Ruditsa, a fish farm is organized for growing rainbow trout. Water for fish-breeding cages is taken directly from springs through pipes, as the water in the lake is polluted with ammonia. The springs located at the base of the slope are partially captured and covered with log cabins.

In 1753, the remarkable Russian scientist M. V. Lomonosov received permission from the government to build a glass factory in the Koporsky district, near Oranienbaum. The place for the construction was well chosen: nearby in the village of Shishkina there was sand suitable for glass-making, and nearby there was a beautiful forest for fuel. The factory was founded on May 6, 1753 near the mouth of the Ruditsa River at its confluence with the Kovash River. Here, according to the project of Lomonosov, a dam was erected, a stone dam, locks and gates, reinforced with strong piles, were built. Then they built a water mill, which set in motion two sawmill frames. The main building of the factory, built of logs, Lomonosov called the "laboratory". Here he proposed to organize the production of various types of glass, beads and mosaics. Next to the laboratory was the building of the workshop, which consisted of five "chambers" - departments. Grinders, engravers and mosaicists worked here, there was a pantry where mosaic compositions were stored. The Ust-Ruditskaya factory mainly produced colored glass prepared according to the recipe of M.V. success. From the smalt obtained here, M. V. Lomonosov and his students created 27 mosaic portraits and paintings. The masterpiece of the Ust-Ruditsky masters is the painting “The Battle of Poltava”. It was made in 1762-1764. In Ust-Ruditsa, Lomonosov took a break from academic troubles, found comfort in creative work and in communion with nature. After the death of the scientist, the factory was empty. In 1765, the enterprise was closed, and its buildings were subsequently destroyed. In memory of the great Russian scientist is alive. By decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR on February 23, 1948, Oranienbaum was renamed the city of Lomonosov.

The nature of the surroundings of Lopukhinka is interesting and unique. On the limestones on the slopes of the valley, heavily disturbed mixed forests with spruce, birch, aspen and broad-leaved species in the second tier (maple, linden, ash) have been preserved. The grass cover is dominated by ruderal species.

The field, built of silver stones of various shapes, recalls the calcareous slopes of the valley (ravine), in which there is a radon lake - an indication of a landscape natural monument, included in the Red Book of the Leningrad Region.

The scarlet (red) griffin is a symbol of the toponym Lopukhinka, which goes back to the names of noble owners. In addition, the griffin is the keeper of the local unique history, the memory of the great scientist M.V. Lomonosov.

Scarlet (red) - a symbol of labor, life-affirming power, courage, selflessness, holiday, beauty, sun and warmth.

Silver is a symbol of purity of thoughts, sincerity, virtue, innocence.

Coat of Arms order

3.1. The reproduction of the Coat of Arms, regardless of its size, technique of execution and purpose, must exactly correspond to the heraldic description given in clause 2.1. Article 2 of this Regulation. Reproduction of the Coat of Arms is allowed in multi-color, one-color and one-color using conditional shading to designate colors options (Appendices 1,2,3 to this Regulation).

3.2. Responsibility for the distortion of the design of the coat of arms, or a change in the composition or colors that go beyond the heraldically permissible, shall be borne by the performer of the admitted distortions or changes.

The procedure for the official use of the Coat of Arms

4.1. The coat of arms of the municipality is placed:

On the buildings of official representative offices of the municipality Lopukhinskoe rural settlement outside the municipality Lopukhinskoe rural settlement;

In the meeting rooms of local governments;

In the offices of the head of the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement, elected and appointed officials of local self-government.

4.2. The coat of arms is placed on the forms:

Legal acts of local self-government bodies and officials of local self-government;

Representative body of self-government;

Heads of the municipal formation Lopukhinskoye rural settlement, the executive body of local self-government;

Other elected and appointed officials of local self-government.

4.3. The coat of arms is reproduced on certificates of persons serving in positions in local governments, municipal employees, deputies of a representative body of local government; members of other local self-government bodies.

4.4. The coat of arms is placed:

On the seals of local governments;

On the official publications of local governments.

4.5. The coat of arms may be placed on:

Awards and commemorative signs of the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement;

The official signs of the head of the municipal formation Lopukhinskoye rural settlement, the chairman of the representative body of local government, deputies of the representative body of local government, municipal employees and employees of local governments;

Pointers at the entrance to the territory of the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement;

Objects of movable and immovable property, vehicles that are in municipal ownership;

Forms and seals of bodies, organizations, institutions and enterprises that are in municipal ownership, municipal administration or municipal subordination, as well as bodies, organizations, institutions and enterprises, the founder (leading co-founder) of which is the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement;

In the meeting rooms of the governing bodies and the offices of the heads of bodies, organizations, institutions and enterprises that are in municipal ownership, municipal administration or municipal subordination, as well as bodies, organizations, institutions and enterprises, the founder (leading co-founder) of which is the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement ;

On objects of movable and immovable property belonging to bodies, organizations, institutions and enterprises that are in municipal ownership, municipal administration or municipal subordination, as well as to bodies, organizations, institutions and enterprises, the founder (leading co-founder) of which is the municipality of Lopukhinskoye rural settlement, vehicles.

4.6. It is allowed to place the Coat of Arms on:

Printed and other publications of informational, official, scientific, popular science, reference, educational, local history, geographical, guide and souvenir character;

Diplomas, invitations, business cards of the head of the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement, officials of local governments, deputies of the representative body of local government;

It is allowed to use the Coat of Arms as a heraldic basis for the manufacture of signs, emblems, other symbols when decorating one-time anniversary, commemorative and entertainment events held in the municipality Lopukhinskoe rural settlement of the Lomonosovsky municipal district of the Leningrad Region or directly related to the municipality Lopukhinskoe rural settlement of the Lomonosovsky municipal district of the Leningrad Region in agreement with the head of the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement of the Lomonosov municipal district.

4.7. With the simultaneous placement of the ARMS and the State Emblem of the Russian Federation, the GERB is located to the right of the State Emblem of the Russian Federation (from the point of view of facing the coats of arms).

With the simultaneous placement of the Coat of Arms and the coat of arms of the Leningrad Region, the Coat of Arms is located to the right of the coat of arms of the Leningrad Region (from the point of view of facing the coats of arms).

With the simultaneous placement of the coat of arms, the State Emblem of the Russian Federation and the coat of arms of the Leningrad Region, the coat of arms of the Russian Federation is located in the center, the coat of arms of the Leningrad Region is to the left of the center, and the Coat of Arms is to the right of the center (from the point of view of facing the coats of arms).

With the simultaneous placement of the Coat of Arms with other coats of arms, the size of the Coat of Arms cannot exceed the dimensions of the State Emblem of the Russian Federation (or other state emblem), the emblem of the Leningrad Region (or the emblem of another subject of the Russian Federation).

When the Coat of Arms is placed simultaneously with other coats of arms, the Coat of Arms cannot be placed above the State Emblem of the Russian Federation (or other state emblem), the emblem of the Leningrad Region (or the emblem of another subject of the Russian Federation).

When placing the coat of arms with any state coat of arms, the coat of arms of a subject of the Russian Federation or a foreign region, the coat of arms of another municipality, in cases where the coats of arms placed next to the coat of arms do not have additional elements, the coat of arms is used without additional elements.

4.8. The procedure for the manufacture, use, storage and destruction of forms, seals and other media of the image of the Coat of Arms is established by local governments.

4.9. Other cases of using the Coat of Arms are established by the Head of the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement.

5.1. The use of the Coat of Arms in violation of these Regulations, as well as desecration of the Coat of Arms, entails liability in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation.

Final provisions

6.1. The introduction of any external decorations, as well as elements of the official symbols of the Leningrad Region, into the composition (drawing) of the Coat of Arms is permissible only in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation and the Leningrad Region. These changes must be accompanied by a revision of Article 2 of this Regulation to reflect the introduced elements in the description.

6.2. Control over the fulfillment of the requirements of these Regulations is assigned to the Administration of the municipal formation Lopukhinskoye rural settlement.

Appendix N1

to the Regulation

about the coat of arms of the municipality

Lopukhinskoe rural settlement

COLOR IMAGE OF THE COAT OF ARMS.

Appendix N2

Lopukhinskoe rural settlement

BLACK AND WHITE

OUTLINE IMAGE OF THE COAT OF ARMS.

ApplicationN3

to the Regulations on the coat of arms of the municipality

Lopukhinskoe rural settlement

BLACK AND WHITE

OUTLINE COAT OF ARMS

USING CONDITIONAL HATCH FOR

NOTATION COLORS.

APPROVED

decision of the Council of Deputies

municipality

Lopukhinskoe rural settlement

MO Lomonosov municipal

district of the Leningrad region

Application №2

REGULATIONS ON THE FLAG OF THE MUNICIPALITY LOPUKHINSKOE RURAL SETTLEMENT OF THE LOMONOSOVSK MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF THE LENINGRAD REGION.

This regulation establishes the flag of the municipality of the Lopukhinskoe rural settlement of the Lomonosovsky municipal district of the Leningrad Region, its description and the procedure for official use.

1. General Provisions

1.1. The flag of the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement of the Lomonosovsky municipal district of the Leningrad region (hereinafter referred to as the Flag) is the official symbol of the municipality of the Lopukhinsky rural settlement of the Lomonosov municipal district of the Leningrad region.

1.2. The regulations on the flag and the drawing of the FLAG are stored in the Council of Deputies of the Municipal Formation Lopukhinskoye Rural Settlement of the Lomonosovsky Municipal District of the Leningrad Region and are available for review to all interested parties.

1.3. The flag is subject to entry into the State Heraldic Register of the Russian Federation.

Flag Description

“The flag of the municipal formation Lopukhinskoye rural settlement of the Lomonosovsky municipal district of the Leningrad region is a rectangular panel with a ratio of the width of the flag to the length of 2: 3, reproducing the composition of the coat of arms of the municipality of the Lopukhinsky rural settlement of the Lomonosov municipal district of the Leningrad region in white, red and black colors.”

Flag playback order

3.1. The reproduction of the Flag, regardless of its size, execution technique and purpose, must exactly match the description given in Article 2 of this Regulation and the drawing given in the appendix to this Regulation.

3.2. Responsibility for the distortion of the Flag, change of composition or colors that go beyond the limits of heraldically permissible, shall be borne by the performer of the committed distortions or changes.

Order of official use of the Flag

4.1. The flag is raised permanently:

On the buildings of local governments;

On the buildings of the official representative offices of the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement of the Lomonosovsky municipal district of the Leningrad region outside the municipality of the Lopukhinskoye rural settlement of the Lomonosov municipal district of the Leningrad region.

4.2. The flag is permanently set:

In the meeting rooms of local governments,

In the offices of the head of the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement, elected and appointed officials of local self-government.

4.3. The flag can:

Be raised permanently or be raised on buildings and territories of bodies, organizations, institutions and enterprises that are in municipal ownership, municipal administration or municipal subordination, as well as on buildings and territories of bodies, organizations, institutions and enterprises, the founder (leading co-founder) of which is a municipal formation of the Lopukhinskoe rural settlement of the Lomonosovsky municipal district of the Leningrad Region;

To be installed permanently in the meeting rooms of the governing bodies and in the offices of the heads of bodies, organizations, institutions and enterprises that are in municipal ownership, municipal administration or municipal subordination, as well as bodies, organizations, institutions and enterprises whose founder (leading co-founder) is a municipal formation Lopukhinskoye rural settlement of the Lomonosov municipal district of the Leningrad region.

The flag or its image can:

Placed on the vehicles of the head of the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement; other elected officials of local self-government;

Placed on vehicles owned by the municipality.

4.4. The flag is raised (set):

On public holidays - along with the State Flag of the Russian Federation;

During official ceremonies and other festive events held by local governments.

4.5. The flag may be hoisted (installed) during solemn events held by public associations, enterprises, institutions and organizations regardless of the form of ownership, as well as during private and family celebrations and significant events.

4.6. When using the Flag as a sign of mourning, the Flag is lowered to half the height of the flagpole (mast). If it is not possible to lower the flag at half-mast, and also if the FLAG is installed indoors, a black ribbon folded in half and attached to the place of folding is attached to the upper part of the pole above the flag cloth, the total length of which is equal to the length of the flag cloth, and the width is at least 1/10 of the width flag cloths.

4.7. When simultaneously raising (placing) the Flag and the State Flag of the Russian Federation, the Flag is located to the right of the State Flag of the Russian Federation (from the point of view of the one facing the flags).

When simultaneously hoisting (placing) the Flag and the flag of the Leningrad Region, the Flag is located to the right of the flag of the Leningrad Region (from the point of view of the one facing the flags).

When simultaneously hoisting (placing) the Flag, the State Flag of the Russian Federation and the Flag of the Leningrad Region, the State Flag of the Russian Federation is located in the center, and the Flag is located to the right of the center (from the point of view of the one facing the flags).

When simultaneously raising (placing) an even number of flags (but more than two), the State Flag of the Russian Federation is located to the left of the center (if you stand facing the flags). To the right of the State Flag of the Russian Federation is the flag of the Leningrad Region, to the left of the State Flag of the Russian Federation is the Flag; to the right of the flag of the Leningrad Region is the flag of another municipality, public association, or enterprise, institution or organization.

4.8. The size of the flag panel may not exceed the size of panels hoisted (installed) next to it of the State Flag of the Russian Federation (or other state flag), the flag of the Leningrad Region (or the flag of another subject of the Russian Federation).

The flag cannot be located higher than the State Flag of the Russian Federation (or other state flag), the flag of the Leningrad Region (or the flag of another subject of the Russian Federation) raised (installed) next to it.

4.9. The flag or its image can be used as an element or heraldic basis:

Flags, pennants and other similar symbols of bodies, organizations, institutions and enterprises that are in municipal ownership, municipal administration or municipal subordination, as well as bodies, organizations, institutions and enterprises, the founder (leading co-founder) of which is the municipality Lopukhinsky rural settlement of the Lomonosovsky municipal district Leningrad region;

Awards of the municipal formation Lopukhinskoye rural settlement of the Lomonosov municipal district of the Leningrad region;

Official and distinctive signs of the head of the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement, deputies of the representative body of local government, elected and appointed officials, employees of local government and its divisions;

4.10. The flag can be raised (set) permanently or temporarily:

In memorable, memorial and significant places located on the territory of the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement of the Lomonosov municipal district of the Leningrad region;

In places of mass gatherings of residents of the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement of the Lomonosov municipal district of the Leningrad region;

In institutions of preschool education and institutions of secondary education (secondary schools).

4.11. It is allowed to place the Flag or its image on:

Printed and other publications of informational, official, scientific, popular science, reference, educational, local history, geographical, guide and souvenir character;

Diplomas, invitations, business cards of the head of the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement, officials of local governments, deputies of the representative body of local government.

It is allowed to use the Flag as a heraldic basis for the manufacture of signs, emblems, other symbols when decorating one-time anniversary, commemorative and entertainment events held in the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement of the Lomonosovsky municipal district of the Leningrad Region or directly related to the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement of the Lomonosov municipal district of the Leningrad Region .

4.12. Other cases of using the Flag are established by the Head of the municipality Lopukhinskoye rural settlement.

Responsibility for violation of these Regulations

5.1. Use of the Flag in violation of these Regulations. as well as desecration of the Flag entails liability in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation.

Final provisions

6.1. Making any changes or additions to the composition (drawing) of the Flag, as well as elements of the official symbols of the Leningrad Region, is permissible only in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation and the legislation of the Leningrad Region. These changes must be accompanied by a revision of Article 2 of this Regulation to reflect the introduced elements in the description.

6.2. Control over the fulfillment of the requirements of these Regulations is assigned to the Administration of the municipal formation Lopukhinskoye rural settlement.

6.3. This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its official publication.

Annex to the Regulation

about the flag of the municipality

Lopukhinskoe rural settlement

FLAG IMAGE.

Scratch the Russian boyar - you will find a foreigner! Sheremetevs, Morozovs, Velyaminovs...

Velyaminovs

The family originates from Shimon (Simon), the son of the Varangian prince Afrikan. In 1027 he arrived in the army of Yaroslav the Great and converted to Orthodoxy. Shimon Afrikanovich is famous for participating in the battle with the Polovtsy on Alta and did the most for the construction of the Caves church in honor of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary: the precious belt and legacy of his father is a golden crown.

But the Vilyaminovs were known not only for their courage and generosity: a descendant of the family, Ivan Vilyaminov, fled to the Horde in 1375, but was later captured and executed on the Kuchkov field. Despite the betrayal of Ivan Velyaminov, his family did not lose its significance: the last son of Dmitry Donskoy was baptized by Maria, the widow of Vasily Velyaminov, a Moscow thousand.

The following genera stood out from the Velyaminov family: Aksakov, Vorontsov, Vorontsov-Velyaminov.

Detail: Muscovites are still reminded of the noblest Moscow family, the Vorontsov-Velyaminovs, by the name of the street “Vorontsovo Pole”.

Morozov

The clan of the Morozov boyars is an example of a feudal family from among the old Moscow untitled nobility. The founder of the surname is considered to be a certain Michael, who came from Prussia to serve in Novgorod. He was among the "six brave men" who showed special heroism during the Battle of the Neva in 1240.

The Morozovs faithfully served Moscow under Ivan Kalita and Dmitry Donskoy, occupying prominent positions at the Grand Duke's court. However, their family suffered greatly from the historical storms that overtook Russia in the 16th century. Many representatives of a noble family disappeared without a trace during the bloody oprichnina terror of Ivan the Terrible.

The 17th century was the last page in the centuries-old history of the family. Boris Morozov had no children, and the only heir of his brother, Gleb Morozov, was his son Ivan. By the way, he was born in a marriage with Feodosya Prokofievna Urusova - the heroine of the painting by V.I. Surikov “Boyar Morozova”. Ivan Morozov did not leave male offspring and turned out to be the last representative of a noble boyar family that ceased to exist in the early 80s of the 17th century.

Detail: The heraldry of the Russian dynasties took shape under Peter I, which is probably why the coat of arms of the Morozov boyars was not preserved.

Buturlins

According to the genealogical books, the Buturlin family comes from an “honest man” under the name Radsha, who left the Semigrad land (Hungary) at the end of the 12th century to the Grand Duke Alexander Nevsky.

“My great-grandfather Racha served St. Nevsky as a muscle of battle,” wrote A. Pushkin in the poem “My Genealogy”. Radsha became the ancestor of fifty Russian noble families in Tsarist Moscow, among them are the Pushkins, the Buturlins, and the Myatlevs...

His son Vasily Ivanovich Buturlin was the governor of Novgorod, an active associate of Prince Dmitry Pozharsky in his fight against the Polish invaders.

Ivan Ivanovich Buturlin was awarded the title of St. Andrew's Cavalier, General-in-Chief, Ruler of Little Russia for military and peaceful deeds. In 1721, he actively participated in the signing of the Peace of Nishtad, which put an end to the long war with the Swedes, for which Peter I awarded him the rank of general.

Vasily Vasilyevich Buturlin was a butler under Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich, who did a lot for the reunification of Ukraine and Russia.

The Sheremetev family traces its origin to Andrey Kobyla. The fifth generation (great-great-grandson) of Andrei Kobyla was Andrei Konstantinovich Bezzubtsev, nicknamed Sheremet, from whom the Sheremetevs descended. According to some versions, the surname is based on the Turkic-Bulgarian “sheremet” (poor fellow) and the Turkic-Persian “shir-muhammad” (pious, brave Muhammad).

Many boyars, governors, governors came out of the Sheremetev family, not only due to personal merit, but also due to kinship with the reigning dynasty.

So, the great-granddaughter of Andrei Sheremet was married to the son of Ivan the Terrible, Tsarevich Ivan, who was killed by his father in a fit of anger. And five grandchildren of A. Sheremet became members of the Boyar Duma. The Sheremetevs took part in the wars with Lithuania and the Crimean Khan, in the Livonian War and the Kazan campaigns. Estates in Moscow, Yaroslavl, Ryazan, Nizhny Novgorod counties complained about their service.

Lopukhins

According to legend, they descend from the Kasozhian (Circassian) prince Rededi, the ruler of Tmutarakan, who was killed in 1022 in single combat with Prince Mstislav Vladimirovich (son of Prince Vladimir Svyatoslavovich, the baptizer of Russia). However, this fact did not prevent the son of Prince Rededi, Roman, from marrying the daughter of Prince Mstislav Vladimirovich.

It is authentically known that by the beginning of the XV century. the descendants of the Kasozhsky prince Rededi already bear the surname Lopukhins, serve in various ranks in the Novgorod principality and in the Moscow state and own lands. And from the end of the XV century. they become Moscow nobles and tenants at the Sovereign's Court, retaining the Novgorod and Tver estates and estates.

The outstanding family of the Lopukhins gave the Fatherland 11 governors, 9 governors-general and governors who ruled 15 provinces, 13 generals, 2 admirals, served as ministers and senators, headed the Cabinet of Ministers and the State Council.

The boyar family of the Golovins originates from the Byzantine family of Gavrasov, who ruled Trebizond (Trabzon) and owned the city of Sudak in the Crimea with the surrounding villages of Mangup and Balaklava.

Ivan Khovrin, the great-grandson of one of the representatives of this Greek family, was nicknamed “The Head”, as you might guess, for his bright mind. It was from him that the Golovins, representing the Moscow high aristocracy, went.

From the 15th century, the Golovins were hereditary tsarist treasurers, but under Ivan the Terrible, the family fell into disgrace, becoming the victim of an unsuccessful conspiracy. Later they were returned to the court, but before Peter the Great they did not reach special heights in the service.

Aksakovs

They come from the noble Varangian Shimon (in baptism Simon) Afrikovich or Ofrikovich - the nephew of the Norwegian king Gakon the Blind. Simon Afrikanovich arrived in Kyiv in 1027 with a 3,000-strong retinue and built at his own expense the Church of the Assumption of the Mother of God in the Kiev-Pechersk Lavra, where he was buried.

The surname of the Oksakovs (in the old days), and now the Aksakovs, came from one of his descendants, Ivan the Lame.
The word “oksak” means lame in Turkic languages.

Members of this family in pre-Petrine times served as governors, solicitors, stolniks and were rewarded for their good service with estates from Moscow sovereigns.

Scratch the Russian boyar - you will find a foreigner! Sheremetevs, Morozovs, Velyaminovs...

Velyaminovs

The following genera stood out from the Velyaminov family: Aksakov, Vorontsov, Vorontsov-Velyaminov.

Detail: Muscovites are still reminded of the noblest Moscow family, the Vorontsov-Velyaminovs, by the name of the street “Vorontsovo Pole”.

Morozov

Detail: The heraldry of the Russian dynasties took shape under Peter I, which is probably why the coat of arms of the Morozov boyars was not preserved.

Buturlins

His son Vasily Ivanovich Buturlin was the governor of Novgorod, an active associate of Prince Dmitry Pozharsky in his fight against the Polish invaders.

Ivan Ivanovich Buturlin was awarded the title of St. Andrew's Cavalier, General-in-Chief, Ruler of Little Russia for military and peaceful deeds. In 1721, he actively participated in the signing of the Peace of Nishtad, which put an end to the long war with the Swedes, for which Peter I awarded him the rank of general.

Vasily Vasilyevich Buturlin was a butler under Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich, who did a lot for the reunification of Ukraine and Russia.

Many boyars, governors, governors came out of the Sheremetev family, not only due to personal merit, but also due to kinship with the reigning dynasty.

Lopukhins

Aksakovs

They come from the noble Varangian Shimon (in baptism Simon) Afrikovich or Ofrikovich - the nephew of the Norwegian king Gakon the Blind. Simon Afrikanovich arrived in Kyiv in 1027 with a 3,000-strong retinue and built at his own expense the Church of the Assumption of the Mother of God in the Kiev-Pechersk Lavra, where he was buried.

The surname of the Oksakovs (in the old days), and now the Aksakovs, came from one of his descendants, Ivan the Lame.
The word “oksak” means lame in Turkic languages.

Members of this family in pre-Petrine times served as governors, solicitors, stolniks and were rewarded for their good service with estates from Moscow sovereigns.

The noble family of the Lopukhins occupied an important role in the social hierarchy of the then society. But it cannot be said that Lopukhin was lucky in life. Involved in court coups, adventures and intrigues, the Lopukhins were increasingly mired in illegality and abuse. An evil fate hung over the Lopukhins family, which shrouded their entire subsequent history with an ominous mystical shadow. It is worth at least recalling Kaluga Governor Dmitry Ardalionovich Lopukhin, who was infamous for his official abuses, exposed in 1802 by a Special Commission headed by senator, poet Gavriil Romanovich Derzhavin, who became famous for his incorruptibility and justice. This case, notorious throughout the province, became the basis of the plot of the Gogol auditor. And it all happened like this: In 1801, the mayor Ivan Ivanovich Borisov, expressing the general indignation of Kaluga residents with the governor D. A. Lopukhin, wrote a petition to the tsar. Not only the democratic strata of the population, the poor, and serfs suffered from the governor's arbitrariness, as was usually the case, but complaints came from landowners, merchants and manufacturers. Perhaps that is why the complaints were given a quick move and Senator G. R. Derzhavin, known for his incorruptible honesty and justice, was sent to investigate them by the emperor. Not wanting to give the governor the opportunity to cover up the traces of his crimes, Derzhavin settled in the house of I. I. Borisov, introducing himself as a private person, and he himself began to collect information about Lopukhin's "activities". While doing the assigned work, G. R. Derzhavin got acquainted with the city along the way, twice visited the Main Public School, charitable institutions and the hospital, went to the Church of the Intercession. And only having supported the complaints of the townspeople with facts, he appeared in the provincial government with the announcement of his mission. The auditor visited the chambers of the civil and criminal courts to take documents and materials of interest to him for study. Derzhavin's report to the Senate on the results of the audit was strict and impartial, but Lopukhin managed to avoid trial and severe punishment. He was only removed from the post of Kaluga governor, as they say, "got off with a slight fright." This event with the Kaluga governor did not pass without a trace for the poet's work: this episode was reflected in the fable "The Peasant and the Oak".
Such an unpleasant event left a dark mark on the entire Lopukhin family. And, alas, not the only one. But the Lopukhins in terms of nobility and origin were not inferior to the legendary Rurikovich. According to legend, they descended from the Kassogian prince Rededi, the ruler of Tmutarakan, who was killed in 1022 in single combat with Prince Mstislav Vladimirovich. From them descended the offspring, whose representatives laid the foundation for many Russian noble families, including the Lopukhins. A descendant of the legendary Roman Rededich is Mikhail Yuryevich Sorokoum, a boyar under the Grand Duke of Moscow Ivan Danilovich Kalita, who lived at the beginning of the 14th century. He had a son Gleb Mikhailovich, grandson Ilya Glebovich, great-grandson Grigory Ilyich Glebov and great-great-grandson Varfolomey Grigoryevich Glebov, whose son, Vasily, nicknamed Lopukh, became the ancestor of the Lopukhins.
Since the 15th century, representatives of the Lopukhin family served as governors, boyars and townsmen in Veliky Novgorod and Moscow. In 1689, the marriage of Tsar Peter I with Evdokia Fedorovna Lopukhina (1669-1731) contributed to the special elevation of the family. Due to this marriage, the father of the queen, Fedor (Illarion) Avraamovich (1638-1713) and his brothers - Peter the Great Avraamovich (1630 - 1701), Peter the Lesser Avraamovich (d. 1698), Vasily Avraamovich (1646-1698) and Sergei Avraamovich (d. 1711) were granted boyars. Subsequently, they all became victims of royal hostility and palace intrigues. The boyar Pyotr Avraamovich Bolshoi became the first among the Lopukhins to fall victim to the Tsar's enmity. The documents do not record the exact wording of the accusation against him, it is only known that a very powerful man, the boyar Lev Kirillovich Naryshkin, the brother of Tsar Peter's mother, who then headed the Posolsky order, "bashed" him. The king, in spite of the many services rendered to him; in his time, Pyotr Avraamovich, personally tortured the slandered, but with such predilection that the boyar could not stand it and died. The same fate, but somewhat later, befell the second of the brothers - Peter Avraamovich the Lesser. The peasants assigned to the Archangel Cathedral of the Kremlin complained about him to the Tsar. They claimed that "the boyar Lopukhin is killing peasants to death, but there is no trial against him." It is difficult to say how justified this accusation was and whether any inquiry was carried out, but Tsar Peter ordered "to bring the boyar to the Konstantinovsky dungeon." In the files of the secret Preobrazhensky order for 1697, “pompous sheets” were preserved, which say that, being raised on a rack and tortured, Pyotr Avraamovich spoke about the Tsar, that “he is a heretical son, conceived from the Antichrist, brought us boyar Golitsyn, and boyar Neplyuev , but he himself tortured his uncle boyar Pyotr Abramych Lopukhin, poured wine over him and set him on fire. And Pyotr Avraamovich the Lesser, as his elder brother, died during the tsar's "poignant inquiry." In the same year, when the conspiracy of prominent archery chiefs Sokovnin, Tsikler and Pushkin was discovered, Peter suspected other uncles of Tsaritsa Evdokia Feodorovna of participating in it. The tsar put them in disgrace, removing them from Moscow as governors to distant cities: boyar Fyodor Abramovich to Totma; Vasily Abramovich to Saransk; Sergei Avramovich - to Vyazma. And at night of that day, at five o'clock in the night, a sign was observed in the sky over Moscow - an unusual star with a tail appeared in the midday side of the sky.
Thus, the glorious, and at the same time tragic epic of the Lopukhins, which lasted almost eight years, ended with the appearance of an ominous comet. The further sad fate of the marriage of Tsar Peter Alekseevich and Tsarina Evdokia Feodorovna is known; she was tonsured a nun. The father of Tsarina Evdokia Fyodor Avraamovich later returned from Totma, but he no longer lived in Moscow, devoting himself entirely to managing his estates, building temples and founding monasteries. In the documents of 1705, he is shown among the boyars who live in their villages. Other brothers also returned from honorary exile, but they also did not participate in state affairs. The Lopukhins' estates were taken away, but their family estates remained in the possession of the family, which kept the Lopukhins among the largest Russian landowners, and this, in turn, became the key to their fairly quick return to state and public life.
But the persecution of the Lopukhins did not end with the defeat of 1695-1698 - this surname paid dearly for its proximity to the Russian throne. Later there were new disgraces, and torture, and executions, and not only by Tsar Peter Alekseevich, but also during the reign of his daughter, Empress Elizabeth Petrovna. Abraham Fedorovich Lopukhin, the younger brother of the disgraced Empress, was not subjected to obvious persecution in the first decades of Peter's reign. The tsar sent him abroad to study maritime affairs together with young people of the most noble families of Russia. Upon his return, he successfully served, although not in the navy - he was not allowed to the ships beloved by Peter. The end of the brother of the Queen was terrible. His martyrdom falls on the late time of Peter's reign. Abraham Fedorovich, despite strict prohibitions, kept in touch with his sister Tsarina Evdokia Feodorovna, he was also close to his nephew Tsarevich Alexei. The fact that the brother of the former Tsarina corresponded with her, the Tsar, apparently, did not know, but he knew that he spent a lot of time with the Tsarevich. The “maliciousness” of the conversations of uncle and nephew was reported to Tsar Peter back in 1708, but he left the denunciation without consequences - either he considered the matter petty, unworthy of attention, or there was no time, the war with Charles XII of Sweden was in full swing, and the Poltava battle was still was coming. The situation began to change when, in 1716, Tsarevich Alexei fled from Russia to the Austrian Caesar. An embassy headed by Peter Andreevich Tolstoy was dressed up behind him, and the naive Tsarevich fell into the nets set by his father. When Tolstoy brought the unfortunate man to Russia, an investigation began, which revealed, among others, the role of Abraham Fedorovich in the escape of the Heir to the Throne: he knew about him, but did not inform ... It became known about the participation of this Lopukhin in a group dissatisfied with the political course of Tsar Peter Alekseevich. In 1718, Abraham Fedorovich was tortured several times, and in the autumn the Governing Senate announced the verdict - the death penalty by wheeling ... It took place on December 8, 1718 in St. Petersburg, the new young capital of Russia. The severed head of Tsaritsyn's younger brother was impaled on a long iron rod, borrowed for this occasion from the Admiralty, and put on display for all to see in the crowded square of the Edible Market. And the broken body was left on the shameful wheel, where for several months it terrified the people of St. Petersburg, as a reminder of what awaits the Tsar's disobedient and Tsar's criminals.
Then, in connection with the “case of the Tsarevich”, more than one Abraham Fedorovich suffered. They took into custody and subjected his sister, Princess Anastasia Fyodorovna Troyekurova, nee Lopukhina, to a "pompous interrogation". Stepan Ivanovich Lopukhin was exiled to the Kola jail. Tsar Peter did not spare his ex-wife either - the Queen, who was dethroned, was brought to Moscow from the monastery and was also tormented in the "Preobrazhenskaya torture hut." And then Tsar Peter forcibly tonsured her as a nun, as evidenced by the folk song “The tonsure of the queen”, recorded from old people in the Nizhny Novgorod province:

It's unhealthy in Moscow -
The big bell is ringing mournfully,
Mournfully and sadly:
The Sovereign, the Tsar, was angry with the Tsaritsa,
The Tsar sends the Tsaritsa out of Moscow -
And in that monastery in Pokrovskaya.
As Empress Eudoxia will say:
“Where are my young grooms!
You pawn black horses,
You will go to Moscow - do not rush,
You don't make Moscow people laugh,
What can the Sovereign Tsar be touched,
Will he tell me to come back?"
However, the Tsar did not turn the Tsarina out of the way...
The Empress came to Suzdal,
As in that monastery in Pokrovsky,
And meets the Empress Abbess with the sisters
They put on the Queen a black dress,
The black dress is sad
Yes, and soon the Empress was tonsured,

The pseudonym under which the politician Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov writes. ... In 1907 he was unsuccessfully a candidate for the 2nd State Duma in St. Petersburg.

Alyabiev, Alexander Alexandrovich, Russian amateur composer. ... The romances of A. reflected the spirit of the times. As then-Russian literature, they are sentimental, sometimes corny. Most of them are written in a minor key. They almost do not differ from Glinka's first romances, but the latter has stepped far ahead, while A. has remained in place and is now outdated.

Filthy Idolishche (Odolishche) - an epic hero ...

Pedrillo (Pietro-Mira Pedrillo) - a famous jester, a Neapolitan, who arrived in St. Petersburg at the beginning of the reign of Anna Ioannovna to sing the roles of buffa and play the violin in the Italian court opera.

Dahl, Vladimir Ivanovich
Numerous novels and stories of his suffer from a lack of real artistic creativity, a deep feeling and a broad view of the people and life. Dal did not go further than everyday pictures, anecdotes caught on the fly, told in a peculiar language, smartly, lively, with well-known humor, sometimes falling into mannerism and joking.

Varlamov, Alexander Egorovich
Apparently, Varlamov did not work on the theory of musical composition at all and remained with the meager knowledge that he could have taken out of the chapel, which at that time did not care at all about the general musical development of its pupils.

Nekrasov Nikolai Alekseevich
None of our great poets has so many verses that are downright bad from all points of view; he himself bequeathed many poems not to be included in the collection of his works. Nekrasov is not sustained even in his masterpieces: and in them the prosaic, sluggish verse suddenly hurts the ear.

Gorky, Maxim
By his origin, Gorky does not at all belong to those dregs of society, of which he acted as a singer in literature.

Zhikharev Stepan Petrovich
His tragedy "Artaban" did not see a print or a stage, since, according to Prince Shakhovsky and the author's frank opinion, it was a mixture of nonsense and nonsense.

Sherwood-Verny Ivan Vasilievich
“Sherwood,” writes one contemporary, “in society, even in St. Petersburg, was not called anything but Sherwood nasty ... his comrades in military service shunned him and called him the dog name “fidelka”.

Obolyaninov Petr Khrisanfovich
... Field Marshal Kamensky publicly called him "a state thief, a bribe-taker, a fool stuffed."

Popular biographies

Peter I Tolstoy Lev Nikolayevich Ekaterina II Romanovs Dostoevsky Fyodor Mikhailovich Lomonosov Mikhail Vasilyevich Alexander III Suvorov Alexander Vasilyevich